WCAG 2.0 AA Expert Weighs In On the PDF Vs. HTML Debate

A road that splits into two paths - one has a sign reading PDF, the other HTML.

LAKEWOOD, OH – Nearly 1 billion people worldwide live with some form of disability. Many organizations are making their web content accessible to this audience by conforming to WCAG 2.0 AA — the W3C’s standard for web accessibility.

But WCAG 2.0 AA requires organizations to make some difficult decisions, including whether to remediate PDFs or migrate the files to HTML.

David MacDonald, president of CanAdapt Solutions Inc., unveils five attributes to consider in the article PDF vs HTML: Which Is the Best Route to Reach WCAG 2.0. A veteran WCAG Working Group member, MacDonald addresses the differences between HTML and PDFs, including:

  • Mobility
  • Security
  • Time
  • Required Skill
  • Browser Behavior.

To find out which is the best route to create accessible content that conforms to the WCAG 2.0 AA standard, read the article PDF vs HTML now.

Subscribe

Consent*
Clicking Subscribe will take you to the Thank You Page.
Hidden
Status*
Hidden
Lead Source*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

Accessibility Culture

Accessibility News

Company News

General Accessibility Resources

Laws and Regulations

PDF Accessibility Resources


Onix Accessibility Pulse

Whether you work for a government agency, educational institution or for-profit business, you need to keep your finger on the pulse of accessibility. Onix helps you monitor what’s going on in the industry through its news series — Accessibility Pulse. Coverage is written by independent reporters and includes how peers are creating accessible content, regulation and legislation updates, technology trends and more.